top of page
Search

Dreams (2025) by Michel Franco: A wealthy philanthropist, a Mexican ballet dancer, a border crossing, and the lie at the heart of liberal generosity

The Erotic Thriller That Makes Liberal Philanthropy Look Like the Most Elegant Form of Control

She funded his dance school. She had an affair with him. She watched him cross the border illegally to reach her. When he threatened her carefully curated life, she made a choice that exposes everything the foundation was built on: Jennifer McCarthy runs the family foundation that funds ballet schools in Mexico. Fernando Rodríguez is the dancer she began an affair with in Mexico City. He crosses the border illegally to reach her in San Francisco. She is surprised to see him, but they immediately fall into bed. When Fernando wants something real — acknowledgement, inclusion in her life — Jennifer's carefully maintained world begins to fracture. And when it fractures enough, she reaches for the instrument that gives her the most absolute control: his immigration status. From Michel Franco (New Order, Memory), starring Jessica Chastain and real-life ABT principal dancer Isaac Hernández in his acting debut.

Why It Is Trending: Franco's Most Explicitly Political Film Arrives During the Exact Political Moment It Was Designed For

Franco wrote and completed Dreams well before the current US immigration enforcement surge — but the film's release on February 27, 2026, positions it inside the most politically charged immigration climate in decades. The first Chastain-Franco collaboration, Memory, won Peter Sarsgaard the Venice Volpi Cup. Dreams premiered at multiple international festivals including MIFF 2025 before reaching US theatrical in late February. Franco discovered Isaac Hernández — an ABT principal dancer, not an actor — at a ballet performance to which Jessica Chastain's sister had invited him; Hernández went on stage to thank the audience and Franco was immediately struck by his sincerity and charisma. Cinematographer Yves Cape draws contrast between Jennifer's San Francisco privilege and Fernando's Mexican life without reducing either to a postcard.

Elements Driving the Trend: Franco's cold observational style — no non-diegetic score, cuts at the highest point of tension rather than resolution, close adherence to the Bresson-Haneke austerity tradition — gives the film a deliberate distance that critics divide sharply on: either the most formally honest approach to this material or a coldness that prevents genuine emotional engagement. Chastain tackles a role NPR called "monstrous manipulator and exploiter" — Jennifer is explicitly coded as a liberal philanthropist whose virtuous public self is funded by the same resources used to ensnare a younger, undocumented man. Variety called it "a shocking critique of the lopsided power dynamics between a self-protective philanthropist and the Mexican dancer she sponsors." The final 20 minutes — universally cited as the film's most disturbing and most divisive sequence — deliver a twist about Jennifer's actions that reframes everything preceding it.

Virality: The film arrived precisely as ICE enforcement dominated US headlines, making its pre-written critique of liberal immigration hypocrisy feel unnervingly prescient. Chastain's willingness to play an explicitly unsympathetic character with moral responsibility for Fernando's immigration vulnerability gives the film a star-image transgression that generates cultural attention beyond its modest theatrical gross.

Critics Reception: Variety — dares to question liberal activism, thorny moral drama, Chastain gives herself over chillingly to Jennifer's monstrousness. NPR — predictably cynical terrain, point inarguable, methods obvious, Chastain fearless. MIFF review — carefully paced, stark distance invites focus on minutiae, exciting granular approach. Roger Ebert — almost actively boring, little affect or pulse, never figures out what it wants to say. MN Movie Man — flesh over feeling, Chastain delivers gutsy performance in a film that doesn't deserve her bravery, Franco has now proven across three films he can take committed actors and waste them completely. Flickering Myth — final 20 minutes raises racial optics concerns, filmmaker resorting to trauma to jolt audience out of dull slumber. Metascore 61. RT consensus: chilly yet compelling, messy imperfections deepen its quietly tragic impact.

Awards and Recognitions: 5 nominations total. Melbourne International Film Festival 2025. Multiple international festival screenings. US theatrical February 27, 2026. Worldwide gross $379,804.

Dreams arrives as Franco's most explicitly political film and his most divisive — a work whose point is inarguable but whose execution generates intense disagreement about whether the cold formal register serves or undermines the film's moral argument.

What Movie Trend Is Followed: The Liberal Hypocrisy Thriller Gets Its Most Structurally Precise Feminist Power Study

Dreams belongs to a specific tradition of films that use romantic or erotic frameworks to dissect class and power — Parasite, Last Tango in Paris, Eyes Wide Shut — in which desire is the mechanism through which larger social structures reveal themselves. Franco's specific contribution is the philanthropist-as-predator inversion: Jennifer funds the arts in Mexico while simultaneously using that funding infrastructure to maintain control over a young undocumented man she desires. The foundation is both cover and instrument. That structural irony — liberal generosity as a form of possession — is the film's most pointed political argument.

Trend Drivers: Chastain's Willingness to Play Unsympathetic Power Variety noted that in her previous Chastain roles — Molly's Game, The Eyes of Tammy Faye, Miss Sloane — she empowers women and centres social issues. Jennifer McCarthy inverts that pattern: a woman who wields power to possess and ultimately harm a man she claims to love. That inversion is Franco's most provocative casting decision and Chastain's most formally courageous performance choice. Hernández's casting — a principal dancer with American Ballet Theatre who had never acted — gives Fernando's body an expressive authority that trained actors rarely possess, while creating the acting asymmetry that the power dynamic structurally requires: Chastain's command versus Hernández's sincerity.

The film's political argument is embedded in its casting as much as its script.

What Is Influencing Trend: The Haneke-Bresson tradition — cold observation, no emotional manipulation, characters as case studies rather than sympathetic subjects — has a committed international arthouse audience and a consistent commercial ceiling. Franco's Memory showed that his cold register can produce films with broader emotional reach when the subject allows it; Dreams demonstrates that it becomes frustrating when the emotional distance is maintained too consistently. The immigration subject matter's political urgency gives the film cultural significance beyond its modest theatrical footprint.

Macro Trends Influencing: The film's coincidental arrival during a period of intensified US immigration enforcement gives its pre-written critique of liberal immigration hypocrisy an uncanny timeliness that Franco himself did not plan. The philanthropist-as-predator narrative is one that emerges directly from #MeToo's examination of how power operates in cultural institutions. The erotic thriller format — largely abandoned by American cinema — retains international arthouse credibility as a vehicle for political content.

Consumer Trends Influencing: Chastain's Oscar-winner profile gives the film discovery appeal beyond the Franco arthouse audience. The streaming landing (available now per The Film Stage) gives the film a second discovery window after limited theatrical. Hernández's ABT profile — real dancing with genuine expressive authority — gives the film an authentic arts community audience.

Audience Analysis: Franco's Existing Audience, Chastain Fans, and Political Erotic Thriller Seekers The core audience is 25–55 — international arthouse viewers who follow Franco's work after New Order and Memory, Chastain fans willing to follow her into uncomfortable territory, and the political thriller audience that responds to erotic drama with social critique at its centre. The film's cold register and lack of emotional manipulation will reward viewers who meet it on its terms; those expecting conventional romantic drama will find the third act's final revelations tonally shocking and the first two acts frustratingly inert.

Final Verdict: Dreams Is Franco's Most Politically Urgent and Most Formally Frustrating Film — Anchored by Chastain's Most Courageously Unsympathetic Performance and a Final Act That Divides Almost Everyone Who Sees It

Franco delivers a film whose central argument — liberal philanthropic generosity as a form of control, immigration status as a weapon in intimate relationships — is correct, timely, and rarely addressed by mainstream or arthouse cinema with this directness. Whether the cold Haneke-Bresson register is the right vessel for material this politically charged is the critical question the film cannot resolve. Chastain is extraordinary in a role designed to make her unforgettable for the wrong reasons. Hernández's dancing is one of the film's few unambiguous pleasures. The final 20 minutes land harder than anything that precedes them — and generate more ethical discomfort than resolution.

Audience Relevance: For Viewers Who Want Liberal Self-Congratulation Examined Rather Than Celebrated Jennifer McCarthy's foundation does real good in Mexico — and uses that infrastructure to maintain power over a man she desires and controls. The film's most uncomfortable observation is that the philanthropy and the predation are not separate impulses but the same impulse wearing different clothes. That argument lands with precision for viewers who have engaged with critiques of performative liberal activism; it may read as merely cynical for those who haven't.

What Is the Message: The Power Imbalance Between a Philanthropist and Her Subject Is Not Abolished By Desire — It Is Intensified By It Jennifer does not stop being Fernando's benefactor when she becomes his lover. She stops being able to control which aspect of her power is operating at any given moment. The film's final act — her specific response to Fernando's attempt to establish independence — makes explicit what the first hour implied: that the foundation's resources and the relationship's emotional claims are the same instrument.

Relevance to Audience: The Immigration Status as Weapon Dimension Is the Film's Most Politically Specific and Most Disturbing Contribution Fernando's undocumented status is not backstory but the film's central power mechanism — it is what makes Jennifer's control absolute. The third act's revelation about what she does with that mechanism is Franco's most genuinely shocking and most contested formal gesture. That it arrives after an hour of cold emotional distance makes it land differently than it would in a more conventionally emotionally engaged film.

Social Relevance: Liberal Philanthropy, Immigration Control, and the Ecosystem in Which Artists and Their Benefactors Operate RT noted the film's bracing quality as an antidote to "a season of high-minded movies about the redemptive power of art" — Dreams is specifically about how the ecosystem in which that redemption is supposedly offered actually works. The philanthropy-as-possession critique is the film's most socially specific contribution and its most irreducible political content.

Performance: Chastain Is Career-Brave; Hernández Is Authentically Moving When Dancing; the Asymmetry Is the Film's Formal Method Chastain's cold Jennifer — executing her philanthropy and her manipulation with the same professional efficiency, genuinely unable to recognise the corruption of one by the other — is an extraordinary performance in a film that some critics argue doesn't deserve it. Hernández's acting is stiff when required to carry dialogue and genuine when allowed to move — that asymmetry is structurally accurate to the power dynamic but sometimes dramatically frustrating. Friend's greasy Jake and Bell's kindly father give the McCarthy family dynamic its moral spectrum.

Legacy: Franco's Most Politically Contested Film — and the One That Most Directly Addresses What His Cinema Has Always Been About Dreams will be remembered as the film that made Franco's thematic obsession — the violence concealed within privilege, the predation concealed within generosity — most politically explicit. Whether it is also his most successful execution of those themes is the question critics continue to argue. Chastain's performance will be remembered regardless.

Success: 5 Nominations, MIFF 2025, US Theatrical February 27, 2026 5 nominations total. Melbourne International Film Festival 2025. Multiple international festival screenings. US theatrical February 27, 2026. Worldwide gross $379,804. Metascore 61. Now streaming.

Dreams is the film that asks whether the person who funds your dreams also owns them — and answers that question in the most uncomfortable way available.

Industry Insights: Franco's consistent Chastain partnership — Memory produced Venice prize-winning results, Dreams produces significantly more critical division — confirms that the collaboration works best when the material offers emotional complexity alongside formal austerity, and that the cold register becomes a liability when the film's most important moments require emotional engagement the style refuses to provide. Audience Insights: The film's coincidental release during intensified US immigration enforcement gave Dreams a political currency it earned by existing at the right time rather than through marketing — a genuine example of arthouse cinema arriving precisely when its subject is most culturally urgent. Social Insights: A film that shows a liberal philanthropist using a Mexican dancer's undocumented immigration status as an instrument of control — written before the current enforcement surge and released during it — is making the most compressed available argument about what immigration vulnerability actually means in intimate power relationships. Cultural Insights: Dreams positions Franco as the most formally consistent contemporary filmmaker in the Haneke-Bresson tradition of cold observation applied to class and power — and confirms that the tradition's most significant limitation is its structural inability to deliver emotional catharsis when the material most demands it.

Dreams proves that the most honest films about power are sometimes the hardest to watch — not because of what they show but because of what they refuse to let you feel about it.

Summary: One Foundation, One Dancer, One Border Crossing, One Devastating Betrayal

  • Movie themes: Liberal philanthropic hypocrisy as predation, immigration status as weapon in intimate relationships, the ecosystem in which artists and their benefactors operate, desire as an extension rather than an abolition of power, and the specific corruption of generosity by possession.

  • Movie director: Michel Franco — New Order, Sundown, Memory — in his most politically explicit film, applying Haneke-Bresson cold observation to a subject that demands it and occasionally suffers for it. Writes and directs.

  • Top casting: Chastain is career-brave in a role few stars would touch — playing a liberal philanthropist whose virtuous public self and controlling private self are the same person with different audiences. Hernández's dancing is the film's most authentic pleasure; his acting asymmetry is the power dynamic's formal expression.

  • Awards and recognition: 5 nominations total. Melbourne International Film Festival 2025. US theatrical February 27, 2026. Now streaming.

  • Why to watch: Franco's most politically urgent film — an erotic thriller that dissects liberal philanthropy as possession, immigration status as control mechanism, and the ecosystem of arts patronage as a system designed to keep artists grateful and dependent. Chastain at her most courageously unsympathetic.

  • Key success factors: Chastain's career bravery plus Franco's formal precision plus the film's coincidental arrival during an immigration crisis plus Hernández's authentic dancing plus Yves Cape's cinematography — a combination that gives a divisive film the critical standing its subject deserves even when its execution divides.

  • Where to watch: Now streaming. US theatrical February 27, 2026 via Greenwich Entertainment.


Comments

bottom of page